+GodsOtherHand Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 miam luat recent un microSD ( + adaptor SD ) cu 16 lei ( tip pentru timisoreni..la auchan daca vreti are si veteze ok. eu scriu pe el cu 5mb/s si copiez de pe el cu 13mb/s )de 8gb. Fiind SDHC era formatat fat32, ceea ce e enervant datorita limitarii la 4 gb a unui singur fisier. (din cand in cand mai transfer un .iso, care mai depaseste marimea asta. ) So lam formatat momentan in NTFS dar am vazut ca e si optiunea exFAT. ambele sunt licentiate de microsoft, so.. de ce exFAT e folosit mai des la chestii de genu (SDXC foloseste exFAT) decat NTFS si voi observa vreo diferenta? (parca la ntfs se ocupa oleaca din spatiu..cam 80mb) Quote love is a verb Love is a doing word Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Dan O. Posted June 15, 2012 Moderators Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 exFAT e succesorul lui FAt32. La fel ca acesta din urma, e facut sa functioneze pentru formatare a unitatilor de stocare mai mici. NTFS-ul e mult mai complex, dar iti permite sa folosesti unitatile de stocare la capacitatea lor maxima (vorbesc de hdd-uri mai mari de 80-150 GB, interne, cu sisteme de operare pe ele). exFAT e foarte recomandat pentru usb-uri sau hdd-uri externe... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+alex008 Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 exFAT e foarte recomandat pentru usb-uri sau hdd-uri externe... de ce? care sunt avantajele si dezavantajele folosirii formatului fat32 ntfs exfat si care or mai fi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Dan O. Posted June 15, 2012 Moderators Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Pentru ca pentru asta a fost construit. O sa dau niste quote-uri din Wiki daca doriti. Acum ma pregatesc sa plec. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+alex008 Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Pentru ca pentru asta a fost construit. O sa dau niste quote-uri din Wiki daca doriti. Acum ma pregatesc sa plec. Sigur de ce nu?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+GodsOtherHand Posted June 15, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 eu am citit pe wiki, insa nu am vazut motive pentru exfat sau pentru ntfs. Ambele sunt dezvoltate de Microsoft, so nu sunt free. Ntfs are avantaju ca e recunoscut pe orice calculator, pe cand exFAT are suport limitat in Linux (hai sa zicem ca asta nu e mare scofala). exFAT ar avea un avantaj teoretic la capitolu viteza, insa acesta e nesemnificativ (eu am testat cu ambele nu am vazut nici o diferenta). Tot nu vad de ce se prefera exFAT pe dispozitivele astea si nu NTFS. Nu e graba, e mai mult o curiozitate personala Quote love is a verb Love is a doing word Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaby Posted June 16, 2012 Report Share Posted June 16, 2012 Iata un mic tabel in care se pot vedea diferentele dintre exFAT si FAT16, FAT32, NTFS: Asadar, eu spun sa ramai pe NTFS. 1 Quote Te-ai inregistrat? Ne-ar placea sa te prezinti. Cum pot sustine forumul? Cumpara de la eMag folosind acest link. -------------------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+GodsOtherHand Posted June 16, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 16, 2012 cluster size 32mb? >.< ai de curu meu >.< Quote love is a verb Love is a doing word Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Lus Posted June 16, 2012 Report Share Posted June 16, 2012 Iata un mic tabel in care se pot vedea diferentele dintre exFAT si FAT16, FAT32, NTFS: Asadar, eu spun sa ramai pe NTFS. Stiam ca dimensiunea maxima la exFAT era 4GB, mhm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaby Posted June 16, 2012 Report Share Posted June 16, 2012 No, aceea este la Fat32 . Quote Te-ai inregistrat? Ne-ar placea sa te prezinti. Cum pot sustine forumul? Cumpara de la eMag folosind acest link. -------------------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Lus Posted June 16, 2012 Report Share Posted June 16, 2012 FAT32 (File Allocation Table) Read/Write FAT32 from both native Windows and native Mac OS X. Maximum file size: 4GB. Maximum volume size: 2TB NTFS (Windows NT File System) Read/Write NTFS from native Windows. Read only NTFS from native Mac OS X To Read/Write/Format NTFS from Mac OS X: Install NTFS-3G for Mac OS X (free) Some have reported problems using Tuxera (approx 33USD). Native NTFS support can be enabled in Snow Leopard, but is not advisable, due to instability. AirPort Extreme (802.11n) and Time Capsule do not support NTFS Maximum file size: 16 TB Maximum volume size: 256TB HFS+ (Hierarchical File System, a.k.a. Mac OS Extended) Read/Write HFS+ from native Mac OS X Required for Time Machine or Carbon Copy Cloner backups of Mac internal hard drive. To Read/Write HFS+ from Windows, Install MacDrive To Read HFS+ (but not Write) from Windows, Install HFSExplorer Maximum file size: 8EiB Maximum volume size: 8EiB exFAT (FAT64) Supported in Mac OS X only in 10.6.5 or later. exFAT partitions created with OS X 10.6.5 are inaccessible from Windows 7 Not all Windows versions support exFAT. See disadvantages. exFAT (Extended File Allocation Table) AirPort Extreme (802.11n) and Time Capsule do not support exFAT Maximum file size: 16 EiB Maximum volume size: 64 ZiB Aveam impresia ca exFAT e FAT32. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.